Archive for May, 2009

Les Paul

May 31st, 2009

Here are  few names you might recongize:

  1. BB King
  2. The Beatles
  3. Van Halen
  4. Jeff Beck
  5. Your mother

Ok, so that last one isnt’t so appropriate.  But the first four are people that belong to music imortality.  Lets all guess who they say is the man that is responsibly for modern music:

  1. Les Paul
  2. Les Paul
  3. Les Paul
  4. Les Paul
  5. Les Paul

That’s right!  Even yo mutha likes Les Paul.  Why could that be?  Well, lets throw away his prolific career as one of the greatest guitarists ever.  Let us just consider that he invented the solid body guitar, the electrical guitar, multi-track record and a little thing called reverb.   FUCK!  You need to stand down.  This guy owns you!

Les Paul was a legend in his own time as a guitarist, and let so many others be legends for future generations. Just ask anyone.  Like Paul McCarteney.  Or Eddie Van Halen.  Or BB King.

Les Paul has been a personal hero of mine of some time.  If you get a chance please watch Let Paul, Chasing the Sound.

Lester Polfuss, you fucking rock!

Wikipedia Bans Scientology Editors from Site

May 29th, 2009

Several news source are reporting this morning that the ruling body of Wikipedia has banned the Church of Scientology IP blocks from editing Wikipedia.  Members of the organization were believed to have been constantly editing articles related to Scientology, removing any critical or negative information posted to articles, and posting biased information of their own.

While I usually disagree with censorship, I think this is a case of true abuse of Wikipedia by The Church of Scientology.  Scientologists have used an organized, aggressive attack on those that would criticize their organization.  This attack has occurred through personal intimidation, the courts, and through online attacks and editing by church members.  Banning Scientology editors from the site sends a clear signal to others that might maliciously edit on the site.

Other groups, including Catholics and the US Congress have attacked Wikipedia in the courts or through biased and malicious editing because they didn’t agree with the content of the site.  The US Congress’s IP range was actually temporarily blocked by Wikipedia to stop a string of biased edits.  I am happy to hear that the leadership took this stance to continue to crack down on these types of people.  Wikipedia is a great resource.  Never in the history of humankind as so much knowledge been agregated in one place for public consumption.  I think that resource needs to be protected from those that would harm it for personal gain.

Google Web Elements add Google goodness to your web site

May 27th, 2009

Google has a number of awesome products, ranging from its traditional search to its mapping to its online office replacement.  They have now packaged several of their products as free widgets that can be embedded into a web site with ease.  They are calling this Google Web Elements.

Maps

News Videos

Search JasonJackson.com

Loading


Pretty cool stuff.

Metallica Whiplash in Lego

May 24th, 2009

Google Chrome 2.0: Doesn’t suck as bad

May 22nd, 2009

I downloaded the newly-released Google Chrome 2.0.  It still sucks but not nearly as bad as it did.  I won’t be switching away from Firefox as my everyday browser anytime soon, but Chrome is getting there.  Here are a few of the let downs:

  • Full-screen mode: In Firefox I just move my mouse to the top of the screen to get at the address bar and other commands.  There is no way to navigate or do any other tasks with your mouse while in full-screen in Chrome.
  • Lack of extensions.  I guess this was in the betas but didn’t make it to GA.  The ability to quickly and easily create extensions is one of Firefox’s best assets.
  • Plugin ecosystem is small.  Much more difficult to write a plugin that an extension.
  • A little clunky.  Google has tried to do their own thing a little too much here.  The browser feels foreign even after a couple of hours of use.  If that is the case for a technophile like myself, it will certainly be the case for Joe and Jane Average User.

Here are a few positives:

  • Large screen real-estate dedicated to page.
  • Silverlight and Flash both seem to work out of the box.
  • Fast Javascript.  But not that much faster that Firefox, and not for long.

I am one of those that believes that Google would be better served improving the Firefox code-base (to which they still donate people & money) than building chrome.  Hell, they could even put the chrome UI on top of the Firefox functionality.  Now that would be a nice web browser.  Still, if they build a better browser then I may switch.  Only time will tell.

Nat Geo Richard Dawkins Videos Celebrating Darwin’s 200th Birthday

May 14th, 2009

Here are five segments of an interview with Richard Dawkins by National Geographic celebrating Darwin’s 200th birthday.

New Guitar Amp

May 12th, 2009

I purchase the Line 6 Spider III amp as a late birthday present for myself a couple of weeks ago.  It has been a while since I have had a working amp.  Sometime during various moves the little practice amp I purchased in High School got fried.  

My first impression shopping for amps was how inexpensive they had become.  I paid $99 for my amp.  In high school or college 15 years ago I would have paid much, much more for the features that came with the amp.  It has a number of built-in effects and a noise gate.  It also has four assignable presets, similar to a traditional car radio.  I can dial in a clean, a crunch, a full-out heavy metal roar, and a clean/chorus for various songs.  The only thing I missed out on buying the cheaper Spider is that I cannot buy a foot switch for the modes, but really, I am never going to play in front of people with the thing!

I have never been a very good guitar player.  When I was in high school I hung out with some talented musicians that had formed a heavy metal band.  I decided to get into guitar.  I purchased an Epiphone Explorer at a pawn shop for $150, and bought the cheapest Crate amp at the local shop that had distortion.  Soon I was memorizing Enter Sandman.

In college I like to play occasionally.  One summer I was in a pawn shop (reoccuring theme) with my father and found my Gibson Les Paul.  It was a steal (perhaps literally?).  There are various models of Les Paul guitars.  I had found the expensive one, the one that sales for $2500 new.  We picked it up for just under $400.

I played (perhaps too strong of a word) this guitar that is much too nice for its owner for several years until I finally ordered a replacement pick guard and a couple of knobs to replace missing hardware on the guitar.  It was time to buy an amp.  So here I am.  I have a beautiful axe and an amp that rocks.  No excuse left!

Les Paul with new Line 6 Amp

I now find myself trying to do some small justice to my axe.  I have started relearning guitar.  I am taking a two-pronged approach.  One prong is simply to relearn songs I knew 10 years ago.  I started with Enter Sandman.  Prong two is to start learning properly.  I have started relearning the scales and chords.  The last couple of nights I have spent trying to play the E Minor scale up and down.  On guitar E Minor is the de facto scale.  While there is plenty of music written in different scales, E Minor is very popular because the traditional guitar tuning starts with E on the low string and end with E on the high string. Additionally, all of the open strings are notes in E Minor.

Notice I said trying in the previous paragraph.  Man, it seems like I can kinda remember the intro for Sandman, or the chorus, but playing a scale is turning into a challenge.  Well, playing it slowly isn’t  a challenge.  But I keep wanted to strum up and down the scale rapidly like I knew I could do at one time.

I have set a goal for myself.  I want to be able to play guitar with the proficiency I had in college by this next winter.  I wonder if I will be able to stick with it.  I hope so, because I remember that playing used to provide me with a lot of joy.

Star Trek: A Pure Joy

May 11th, 2009

I went to view the new J.J. Abrams Star Trek this weekend at the Alamo Drafthouse at noon on Saturday.  I was excited for two reasons.  First, I have been a Star Trek fan for many years.  Since First Contact, the Star Trek movies have really languished.   I was interested in seeing what would be done with the franchise.

Second, I have always enjoyed J.J. Abrams work.  Alias is one of my favorite shows.  I also enjoyed Mission Impossible 3, which was written and directed by Abrams.  So how would his treatment of Star Trek work?

Awesome.  Star Trek was a pure joy to watch.  It looked good.  The acting was spot on.  The story was classic Star Trek.  Without giving too much away, Abrams et. al. have created an interesting new Star Trek that breaks slightly with the original while leaving much intact and not destroying continuity.  You may have heard rumors about time travel on the internets, but I am not going to give anything away.  Go see the movie.

My wife, who is not a trekkie in the least, also really enjoyed the movie.  She and I both noticed how much humor is in this one, which is something that has occasionally been lacking in past installments.  Also, the movie never really rests.  Don’t go for a bathroom break.  You WILL miss plot and action.

I am excited to see it again on Wednesday, when a group from work is going to see the movie for lunch.  The Alamo is going to make plenty of money off me this week.